Wednesday, December 18, 2013

#140WaystoTelltheWorld Proposal


#140WaystoTelltheWorld
In 2006, Evan Williams, Jack Dorsey and Biz Stone changed the way the digital world communicated. Entering the social media world after social giants Myspace and Facebook (each aligning how an entire generation communicates today), Twitter challenged the way digital and community literacy practices were conducted- if you had to express yourself in 140 characters or less, what would you say?
            In the essay #140WaystoTelltheWorld, I intend to discuss the changes that Twitter Literacy, or “Twitteracy” (Greenhow and Gleason 2006) has impacted how readers receive and exchange information, and how it changes and supports current literacy practices. How have community literacy and digital literacy integrated into one large exchange of information and culture? What are some of the challenges to maintaining traditional literacy practices while incorporating current literacy practices? Who are the readers who are utilizing these new forms of literacy? What are researchers and scholars saying about the shortened language use on Twitter and other social media? Does this shorthand affect how we use language outside of these forums, or is there actually a motive to take caution?
            As a digital native and participant in social media, I have lived inundated by the world of digital literacy, and I have been part of the constant shifting. Also, my own literacy education has taken me through scribal literacy (learning at a young age to write, and using it as a main form of expression), print literacy with books, newspapers and magazines, and has integrated these more traditional forms of literacy with digital literacy-- a practice that takes place on a screen. My goal is to now study the some of the effects of digital literacy through the platform of Twitter.
I look to compile the studies and ideas of various researchers, scholars, participants and reporters and make connections to the various methods of practicing literacy. I will use my personal experience as a frame for the essay and connect my observations in my own Twitter literacy practices to other points-of-view and studies on the effect of Twitter on literacy.
I am researching to discover how Twitter can be considered a new literacy practice by using Greenhow and Gleason's essay as a secondary source for support. My primary source will be the actual interactions that I find using my own Twitter account, which I use mainly for the receipt of news media and current events, this will be an opportunity to evaluate how my own literacy practices have changed. Other reports include John Brydan, Sebastian Funk, and Vincent AA Jansen’s article “Word usage mirrors community structure in the online social network Twitter” to show how digital literacy has also taken on the many traits of community literacy, and touches on cultural literacy.
Works Cited

Bryden, John, Sebastian Funk, and Vincent AA Jansen. “Word usage mirrors community structure in the online social network Twitter.” EPJ Data Science 2.3 (2013): n. pag. Web. 6 Nov 2013.

            Bryden et al did a research study to test the language and social network structures reflected the already known transmission of information of language functions social contexts. By connecting vocabulary patterns in member communications, they were able to find proof of an “heirarchy of communities”. Through this, they can find relationships between human language and social networks and how technology has maintained these same traits.

Greenhow, Christine and Benjamin Gleason.  "Twitteracy: Tweeting as a New Literacy Practice" The Educational Forum, Vol 76 (2012): 464-478. DOI. Web. 6 Nov 2013.
           
            Greenhow and Gleason discuss how the literacy practices that occur on Twitter can be considered a new form. Following the definiton outlined by Coiro et al in their essay “Central issues in new literacies and new literacies research” Greenhow and Gleason argue that Twitter fits the definition provided, and that it should be considered as a new literacy. As a forum for language development in ELLs and exchanging information, Twitter has been found to be a useful tool, although moving it into the classroom many pose a greater challenge.

Margerison, Jill. “Online discussion forums in the classroom: can the principles of social media benefit literacy and enhance engagement with learning?” Literacy Learning: The Middle Years 21.2 (2012): 19+. Academic OneFile. Web. 6 Nov 2013.


            Jill Margerison discusses the expanded possibilities for readers to engage in new forms of communication via technology. As the screen becomes the dominant form of interactions between teens, the way they read follows that very same trend- the incorporation of non-linear and non-sequential reading paths. Through these new online platforms teen readers are new ways to build and construct identity and belong to a group. 

On Other People's Words

While reading Purcell-Gates' book, I gained further insight in how much the literacy of families impacts the expectations that the child has. Because Jenny and Big Donny did not use reading and writing practices as normal and routine parts of their day, Donny did not find importance, nor the need, to read and write. This was reflected in his attitude toward schooling.

I noticed how one of the largest barriers to their learning was the attitude that they carried about their ability (or inability to them) to learn how to read. This deficit of motivation most likely stemmed from a multitude of things that were cultural, personal and familial.

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

Reflection on the Semester

Reflecting on this semester in Theories and Models of Literacy, I realize that all of the reading truly impacted how  I view literacy practices, how I analyze my own literacy, and why I study language and literacy. Throughout the semester I have been able to focus on why we practice reading and writing the way we do and the impacts that has on our thinking processes. Thinking metacognitively about my own thoughts and literacy practices exposes how much  I really take for granted what the ability to read and write means to me.

As we discussed the multiple implications of literacy development, it was helpful to have secondary sources such as Purcell-Gates'  book to read and analyze. As a teacher, this was extremely insightful, and the book provided another vantage point to my perspective of teaching literacy and the associated literacy practices. I could relate much of the information and experiences in the book to my own basic literacy students. This helped to given a much closer connection to the reading, and therefore a deepened appreciation not only for the assignment, but other readings like it that helped to expand my ideas around literacy. I believe that all of the discussions that took place during the reading were thoughtful and important for the class. With so many diverse backgrounds, the conversations brought even more meaning to the book, and provided other contexts such as  Liberata's literacy experiences in Burundi.

My definition of literacy definitely expanded as I was exposed to more types of literacy and the various arguments surrounding literacy practices and where literacy occurs. Before, I limited my understanding of literacy to academic or learning based practices that were more formalized. Now I have expanded that to be much more social and communal, and to include daily practices such as list making, agendas, schedules and planning.

Analyzing many of the advantages and disadvantages, I now know that the ability to read isn't just a benefit, but in today's society, it is necessary. I do, however, look at the disadvantages, such as little focus on memorization and heightened dependence on writing things down all of the time. I would enjoy spending some time with a culture that isn't as dependent on literacy and note the changes in how I engage myself with the community. This class has definitely been a humbling experience and has set me up to approach my students in a different manner. This class has really informed my own practices and understanding about literacy, and will definitely strengthen the foundation of my professional career as an adult educator. As I continue to develop and grow, the ideas and discourse that I experienced in the class will be a critical part to the role that I play in the lives of adult learners.

#140WaystoTelltheWorld


#140WaystoTelltheWorld: A View on the Impact of Twitter and Social Media on Literacy Practices

Well into the new millennium, a recent transition continues to bridge print and digital platforms, social media began to reconstruct what many thought of the world’s literacy practices and how the world interacted. Tom Anderson revolutionized how many communicated with each other when he created myspace in 2003. Although Anderson began a trend that would continue until even today, Mark Zuckerberg worked to build another larger social media giant known as Facebook in 2004. For many digital natives, or those who were born into a world with digital technology and have acquired the skills necessary to use them in their youth, social media took a significant presence in our daily interactions with others.
Both Myspace and Facebook brought uncertainty to traditional social community practices. They reformatted how people would build, develop and maintain relationships, but even more, they changed how its users sent and received information. From posting notes to posting statuses, the uses of social media built a great presence in the practices of writing. Although the implications of the use of social media on writing practices were still being explored and evaluated, in 2006, Evan Williams, Jack Dorsey and Biz Stone changed the way the digital world communicated. Entering the social media world after the social platforms Myspace and Facebook (each aligning how an entire generation communicates today), Twitter brought new challenges to the way digital and community literacy practices were conducted, and the way many digital natives thought about presenting information- if I had to express myself in 140 characters or less, what would I say and how would I say it?
Twitter @me
The popularity of social media has grown tremendously over the last decade; the possibility to restructure relationships and maintain them through a completely digital sphere gave nearly unlimited possibilities of online social identity and presence. This socially oriented and mediated practice is the basis of what Greenhow and Gleason call “New Literacies” in their essay Twitteracy: Tweeting as a New Literacy Practice. Tying together the importance of print-based and traditional literacies with the increasing prevalence and role of digital literacies, the authors view literacy “from a broader, sociocultural perspective as a dynamic, situationally specific, multimodal, and socially mediated practice that both shapes and is shaped by digital technologies” (467). These new forms of social writing practices focused less on the author and more of the collaboration between multiple parties, resulting in a participative and multimodal literacy practice.
Originally used to maintain social interactions between real life friends, social media connected users with other members online as a way to build online communities and share information with friends and family. I opened my first social media accounts with Myspace and Facebook, and soon after I succumbed to opening a Twitter account with building pressure from friends for me to keep in touch with the ongoing events in popular culture. My sociodigital communities expanded to include friends of friends, celebrity profiles, business profiles (Facebook mainly), news sources, and music artists (Myspace mainly). By selecting and expanding my friend base, I could explore and connect with people all around the world; social media made the world seem a lot smaller.
Twitter became a daily journal for millions who desired to send quick updates to the world about their lives. I viewed Twitter as another window into my friends’ lives that would otherwise go unknown; I could easily see who their favorite music artists were, and even elect to follow them on my own profile; I caught a glimpse into some of the businesses they promote, fashion styles, movie celebrities, and family members. There was a new connection to friends and family, and Twitter allowed shared experiences without shared space; distance was no longer a factor in what entertainment and news could be shared-- what happens in China is felt in America. Although one person may write the original tweet, these short messages could be re-sent among millions of people, reaching many countries and nations.
As a microblog, Twitter allows users to create content, tag others in the content, and then share it with all members of the site, if your profile is set to public. Twitter’s new modes of communication placed constraints on even some of the most liberated forms of writing by restricting the number of characters (individual letters, numbers or signs that make up the message) that each tweet can contain.  These tweets are composed and posted by users, designated by an “@” followed by a username (ex. @140WtTtW). Other qualities of the tweet include the hashtag (#) that designates a specific category or theme relating to the text. Each user creates a profile using their email address and uploads a picture and types in a biography in the “About Me” section to identify themselves. When a message is typed within the correct restrictions, the user sends the message out to their followers, or other members of Twitter, who elect to follow this user. Users have the availability to mention other users by tagging them using the @username system.
With over 230 million users worldwide, Twitter is one of the most widely used online forums in history. Users have the ability to access the website and mobile application in more than 35 languages, and with 77% of members living outside of the United States (Twitter Website), the amount of information and the number of perspectives increase exponentially. Supported on nearly all internet-accessible devices, a majority of active users utilize the Twitter mobile application, allowing 24/7 access from almost anywhere with wireless internet connections or mobile phone coverage.

#MyCommunityMyWriting
My Twitter experience has primarily been focused on sharing news information; by following and subscribing to a very large and diverse array news sources, I can find multiple articles about the same topic, share it, and add my own comments. The literacy practices through Twitter formed an interwoven pattern of scrolling through abbreviated language and deciphering their quick, yet informative messages, finding articles, pictures, videos or other themes that interested me, and clicking on the bit url (a shortened version of a website’s full URL) to access a full news article, commentary, book review, or digital art exhibition. This large multimodal platform brings together diverse populations with an enormous palette of nuanced interests.
Studies have shown that despite the diversity of the Twitter user base, people tend to become part of established (or newly establishing) communities. Through identifying linguistic practices, scientists have been able to identify hierarchy of communities using the frequency of words and the constant replication of spelling patterns. According to Science Daily, groups of users with similar character traits, occupations or interests have expressed use of their own distinctive languages.
These online social interactions through Twitter similarly reflect how common community structures are developed and sustained in real life. By identifying changes in word-endings and letter-pairs, scientist could create subgroups of writing styles and connect users to specific artists, phenomena and locations. In their article in the EPJ Data Science Journal, Bryden et al concluded that the “language we use bears the signature of societal structure” (5). By sharing language, users help structure and preserve their own linguistic qualities and cultural characteristics. These linguistic stylings have had many repercussions throughout world of academia, and especially in the field of writing.
In his book Language and the Internet, Crystal defines the specific internet language as Netspeak; as a language that picks up characteristics of both speech and writing, Netspeak further complicates the idea of composition. Like traditional writing, Netspeak remains fixated in time and space, allows added time to digest and form ideas about the information received, and is visually decontextualized, meaning it has the ability to exist on its own as an entity without visual representations such as diagrams, pictures, charts or videos. Also similar to speech, Netspeak picks up qualities and structures that tend to flow much more fluidly when read aloud and typically picks up the patterns of speech more so than writing.
Unlike traditional essay style forms of writing, Twitter’s limitations force its users to express ideas in a very concise and still legible manner, causing sometimes drastic changes in how the physical message appears. I have found myself thinking of the most logical way to abbreviate words, dropping letters that in traditional writing are important. Some people drop articles, prepositions and vowels, and replace them with specific signs (e.g. using the commercial at (@) to signify at someone or something). Simple messages such as “thx 2 all who came out 2 party! Had a blast. #bday2012” are still understood, clear in idea and meaning, yet is truncated and abbreviated to fit modern online writing. It comprises many of the conventions of English writing (subject and predicate formation, noun and verb concordance, and punctuation), and incorporates conventions of online writing practices and Twitter with the use of a hashtag (#).
Writing on social media has changed how and where writing practices occur; moving away from traditional paper-based literacy practices, online writing incorporates different media to express information, including videos, pictures, diagrams and charts; these visual aids are used to enhance the reader’s experience, and give better context and more thorough information for items that may not be able to be expressed as clearly through words alone. Twitter utilizes many different elements to construct a new experience in literacy; it allows interdisciplinary connections to be made between writing and other subjects, provides a more immediate platform to share ideas, allows users to share ideas through very concise and rapid bursts of information, makes space for group collaboration and enhances community literacy practices.
Screenshot_2013-12-16-10-26-15.pngWriting skills are not only challenged through Twitter practices, but arguably redefined. By modifying words and expanding the use of initialisms, a user can express himself by creating a quick, yet descriptive message, add a hashtag to connect the message to an ongoing theme, and even pinpoint and write to one specific user, or in response to a specific tweet using the Retweet (RT) function. These retweets (seen left) have become useful in preventing misquotes, plagiarism, and the need to always paraphrase another person. Similar to traditional writing, when finding information online, it is necessary to have increased scrutiny when reading so much information, and knowing sources is useful and necessary.
Greenhow and Gleason wrote that Twitteracy (Twitter Literacy) has affected the literacy practices of English-language learners (ELLs) and young immigrant populations. In a longitudinal study, it was found that ELLs were “developing language and literacy, and social skills across national borders” by sharing information, communicating and “negotiating meaning with youth in different countries” (470). Through the use of constant feeds of information, the increased participation of users in particular conversations develop literacy skills and broader discussions; these conversations require more immediate responses, frequent presence and knowledge of sociodigital conventions. This form of self-representation is the foundation of social media-- you must establish yourself within one or more sub-communities, learn the norms of each community, and present well formed ideas and thoughts in a creative manner.

Staying Connected
Screenshot_2013-12-16-10-26-40.pngLike other forms of social media, Twitter used to provide and receive information through online writing. With the multitude of reasons to share information, Twitter has expanded the scope of who sees tweets and how far the tweet goes. Although users can set their profiles to private, a majority of the tweets that are created are posted openly to the public where anyone with the correct hashtag or connections can find and read the posts. Using modern technology is a significant identifying marker for youth, and access to new information is a key component staying informed. According to a CNN article written by Chris Boyette, a report from November 5, 2013 showed that “40% of all U.S. adults get
Text Box: A screenshot of several news sources from my Twitter account using the Twitter mobile app.
news ‘at least sometimes’ on mobile devices.” Although only 8% of the American adult population relies on Twitter for news, 85% of Twitter users receive their news from the site.      
In early 2011, social media sites Facebook and Twitter noted a large increase in user participation on a global scale due to the publicity of the Arab uprisings. Millions of tweets were sent mentioning key words such as “Egypt,” “Libya,” and “Bahrain;” the hashtag “Egypt” saw 1.4 million mentions alone, according to the news site The National’s  article “Facebook and Twitter key to Arab Spring uprisings: report.” News sites such as the Associated Press, The New York Times and NPR tweet current events, updates on previous events, and advertisements about upcoming news segments, allowing users to keep up with news and information without being glued to a television or always on a computer. According to Boyette’s article, a Pew reports showed that the majority of Twitter news content was comprised of breaking news, and not opinion, despite the ease of posting biased and uninformed opinions.
Screenshot_2013-12-16-10-26-26.pngBut national and international news is not the only use for Twitter; fan bases all around the world use Twitter to directly interact with their favorite artists, politicians, and other public figures. Scrolling through my Twitter feed, you will find tweets of upcoming concerts from Beyonce, Solange, and Linkin Park, and comedians such as Sarah Silverman and Dane Cook posting random facts and jokes, and even parody-type profiles that create accounts using the persona of someone who normally wouldn’t have a Twitter account (for example, Betty White). In 2012, Justin Bieber was the third most tweeted topic only behind the Olympics and the 2012 Election.
Who are the Tweeters?
Despite being part of nearly all digital social activities, young aged people are not the only ones who are using Twitter as a sounding board and forum. In fact, the fastest growing demographic of Twitter users is the age group of 55- 64 year olds, although high school and college-age youth are the most likely to adopt the social media forum. According to Greenhow and Gleason, the demographics most likely to use twitter are “African-American teens, lower income teens and girls” (466). Other characteristics show that tweeters are most likely to live in a city and attend college. Twitter reaches across educational levels, socioeconomic statuses, traditional borderlines, and ages; the cosmopolitan website draws on divergent walks of life.

From blogs to chat room forums, the newer forms of social media were the natural next steps for digital natives. The ability to easily post notes and statuses came easily as a form of composing, and the reality is that changing digital composition practices didn’t really come to the minds of natives as a hardship, but simply became another addition to the array of digital interactions that make up the digital native’s résumé.

@teachersin2013 Thnk we r c’n changes in skool literacy? #curricula
            “I wonder if some social media savvy individuals even recognize that OMG and YOLO are not real words,” wrote Jamie Perkins, a graduate student at Gonzaga University in Spokane Washington, to San Jose Mercury News in October of 2013. As I, and many other digital natives, parry this question, it is a very large issue in modern literacy practice, and its implications in academia can potentially reverberate for many years. As the role that digital technology plays in classrooms continues to evolve, the answer to whether or not social media sites, such as Twitter, is negatively affecting a student’s ability to write deep and engaging material that can be constituted as academic writing, is not clear, nor has there been enough time to gather data to argue whether the social media impact is affecting classroom performance.
Some studies have shown that English language learners have greater practice times using out-of-school based platforms; this practice incorporates both traditional and non-traditional literacy practices, and builds on their 21st century literacy skills. Showing how informal writing spaces aligned with traditional literacy skills, Greenhow and Gleason quoted R. Black on how ELLs were able to “practice and improve their English-language and composition skills, develop their technological literacy, the ability to find, select, critically evaluate, and synthesize a range of information across media”(473). These findings showed that ELL students were more motivated to engage in course-related and informal writing practices. I have seen the use of social media increase even with my ELL students; by connecting with family in their own countries and within the United States, they are developing their own biliteracy through these digital interactions, and expanding their fluency in both English and their native languages. The use of multimodal composition should be stressed within the classroom even more than before, since the use of multimodal composing shows expertise in not only text-based literacy, but visual literacies; the incorporation of pictures, diagrams and videos juxtaposed with text demonstrates fluency in the use of technology to support and give meaning.
            Bridging in- and out- of-class experiences can be a challenging part of building classroom curricula; as the digital world is constantly evolving, it is important to find the roles that teachers play in helping develop student literacy practices in both print- and digital- bases. Some believe that the role of teachers can no longer focus on always teaching specific content, but teaching how to decipher and become critical of information provided through digital platforms. News literacy should be taught by teachers, argues Renee Loth in her article “What’s Black and White and Re-Tweeted All Over?” Ideas such as “getting both sides of the story, keeping an open mind, and digging deep to verify facts and assertions” are just a few of the things that Loth wants to see educators implement in their classrooms. The growing scope of where literacy practices occur continues to drive multiple educational reforms, and digital literacy doesn’t appear to have peaked within the last decade, but instead is seen as the future of literacy practices.
           
Opportunities for Further Study and Inquiry
            With so many arguments circling the digital sphere, there are many questions that require further research and criticism. First, it is necessary to compare compositional practices of students who have a great presence in social media and is learning the traditional conventions of print-based writing. Making observations and comparisons between the work that is produced in both realms may give insight to whether online social writing practices directly impact the quality (and perhaps quantity) of work that is produced.
            Second, it is necessary to directly study the implications of the use of Twitter on literacy practices, since there are not many studies directly connecting the two. Many studies draw off of Facebook and Myspace to draw connections and conclusions about various populations and literacy practices.
            Third, it is necessary to continue to research the longer term literacy practices of students, and gather data on their own personal experiences and perspectives on how digital platforms impact how and where they receive information. How do they differentiate print-based literacy from digital literacy, and what are some of the thought processes that occur when they are forced to write formally versus the informal compositions that they produce daily?
            The writing experiences in the world are continually shifting and changing, and although we can see some immediate effects of digital composing, the longer term repercussions have yet to be realized. Whether positive or negative, the impact of social media on writing and reading practices has a tendency to blend traditional community literacy practices with expanded sociodigital community practices. Twitter continues to change the scope of which we view online literacy, how people receive and present information, the types of information that we receive, and increases the ability to provide multimodal opportunities of learning; these changes have implications in and beyond classroom settings and further studies may reveal how our minds, digital technologies and literacy practices are molding and reconstructing each other. 

Works Cited
Bryden, John, Sebastian Funk, and Vincent AA Jansen. “Word usage mirrors community structure in the online social network Twitter.” EPJ Data Science 2.3 (2013): n. pag. Web. 6 Nov 2013.
Boyette, Chris. “Twitter news junkies skew young, educated.” www.cnn.com. CNN. 5 Nov 2013. Web. 5 Nov 2013.
Crystal, David. Language and the Internet. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Print.
Greenhow, Christine and Benjamin Gleason.  "Twitteracy: Tweeting as a New Literacy Practice" The Educational Forum, Vol 76 (2012): 464-478. DOI. Web. 6 Nov 2013.
Loth, Renee. “What’s Black and White and Re-Tweeted All Over?.” Chronicle of Higher Education 58.23 (2012): B4-B5. Education Full Text (H.W. Wilson). Web. 6 Nov 2013.
Margerison, Jill. “Online discussion forums in the classroom: can the principles of social media benefit literacy and enhance engagement with learning?.” Literacy Learning: The Middle Years 21.2 (2012): 19+. Academic OneFile. Web. 6 Nov 2013.
Perkins, Jamie. “Twitter and literacy: Do young writers even know LOL and YOLO aren’t real words?.” www.mercurynews.com. San Jose Mercury News. 18 Oct 2013. Web. 6 Nov 2013.
University of Royal Holloway London. "New research discovers the emergence of Twitter 'tribes'." www.sciencedaily.com. ScienceDaily. 14 March 2013. Web. 17 Dec 2013.


Tuesday, December 10, 2013

Viewing a Writing History- Visiting Columbia Archives



Viewing a Writing History: Response to the Columbia Archive Visit
Today, people all around the world are experiencing one of the largest and swiftest literary shifts that has existed in the history of writing. As the digital world takes a stronger presence in literate cultures, the rich history of writing and printing becomes a point of exploration. From grassroot style beginnings, the history of writing holds many different perspectives and the inventions and developments has reached many parts of the world.

From 3200 BCE., the Sumerians in Mesopotamia invented and used writing independently, and over times other cultures continued to develop writing systems independently while others adopted and modified writing systems to fit their needs. The writing systems varied from picture writing systems (as used in many East Asian languages) to phonetic writing systems (as seen in Romance and Germanic based languages). These writing systems were developed to hold meaning and to record and share information within cultures. Their uses were spread across a wide array of reasons, but the development and understanding could be carried to any person literate in that written language.

Most writings were on papyrus, but this had limits. One disadvantage was the ability to write on both sides; due to being too organic, the papyrus would soak the ink too much. Despite its limitations, the use of papyrus dominated much of the writing world. Columbia University is home to 2000 fragments of papyrus; many of these fragments are were legal and financial documents kept by businesses and households. Homer’s Odyssey was written on papyrus, and the one displayed at Columbia University dates back to the 3rd to 2nd century BCE.

In Europe, the use of writing systems were important and were normally reserved for the elite and the religious; learning to read was not mandatory nor necessarily needed for a majority of the population. With the lack of a printing press, all of the books were handwritten by trained scribes that spent long lengths of time transcribing texts. Many of the texts that exist today from this era are preserved with extreme care in order to maintain snapshots of the pre-print age of writing. Many of these texts were written on parchment and vellum (specifically calf skin). Parchment and vellum were important because they were made of animal skin and capable of having script of both sides of the skin. This was a move that made it easier to create the book; Manguel states in The Shape of the Book that the use of the parchment codex “quickly became the common form of books for officials and priests, travellers and students” (126).

Columbia University’s archive contained one of 12 known copies of the Facsimile of the Vergilius Mediceus which dates from the late 5th century. This interesting piece was written on parchment, and contains a compilation of 14 religious texts, as was common in this time period. The use of parchment allowed pieces to be further decorated with colors and illustrations called embellishments. These decorations were important to help to illustrate the text and to decorate the book itself. Columbia had two Incunable, or books with embellishments, that were on display, and dated from the 1400s AD.

The more elaborately decorated and colored the books were, the more expensive they were, and it noted the economic status and power one (or one’s family) had. For example the two versions of a book of hours were highly decorated to appear beautiful and allowed for full page embellishments to be inserted throughout the book. Bound in wood with nails and threads, these books held prayers for each hour of the day. Although these illustrated pages were decorated, they did not always align with the stories that surrounded them.

The text itself was also decorated, and the varying array of ink colors determined quality and cost of the books. The black inks normally came from two sources depending on where they book was written; in Northern Europe, the black in derived from oak tree galls, and in the south, the ink came from the black soot from lamps. Other inks, such as blues and reds, also represented the worth of the books; blue inks in a book were much more expensive than the books that had red inks. Especially beginning in the 13th century, the use of more color in the books became prevalent, incorporating greens, blues, purples, reds, and other colors.

The style of the texts also changed over time; as scripts developed, the change from Caroline miniscule to “a Renaissance roman hand, known in Italian as scrittura umanistica” (Chappell and Bringhurst 36). These changes did come with some negatives, such as the appearance of being labored and unsteady, often viewed in the earlier models in the late fourteenth and early fifteenth centuries.


Works Cited
Chappell, Warren and Robert Bringhurst. “The Alphabet.” A Short History of the Printed Word. London: Knopf, 1970. 23-42. Print.
Manguel, Alberto. "The Silent Readers." A History of Reading. New York: Viking, 1996. 41-53. Print.




Monday, November 18, 2013

Writing for Cognition- Great Divide and Other Literacy Practices



Writing for Cognition: A Survey of the Great Divide Theory and Other Literacy Theories


Literates have controlled legal, financial and political realms for much time; with the power to create and write rules and laws, they have set in stone the multiple ideas that have shaped the world as we see it today. Over time, the definition of being literate has transformed, each change guided by those who practice literacy imposing these literacy standards on those who exist in both literacy- and oral-based cultures. Many theorists have developed ideas around the benefits and changes that have occurred within literate and nonliterate societies, bringing forth the argument that literacy differentiates, and in some theories, makes superior, or more advanced, those who have acquired the ability to read and write.

The Great Divide Theory remains one of the most influential and contested theories today. According to Jack Goody and Ian Watt, there is a cognitive separation, or divide, between those who are literate and nonliterate. This separation of cognition derives from the ability to manipulate, preserve, and notate information, and results in stronger logical and analytical skills that allow those who are literate to think more rationally. This learned ability then translates into more powerful and more complex thought structures, exhibited in literate societies and not in oral-dominant cultures.

In order to gain a larger perspective of the relationship between literate and nonliterate cultures, there must first be an understanding of what is considered an oral-based culture. As the term suggests, oral cultures are societies and communities who use oral-dominant strategies to give, receive and relay information. Those in oral societies base their understanding of their language on the experiences, stories and concrete items associated with their ways of life. These ideas are normally passed through storytelling, song, and repetitive rituals that assist in acculturating learners.

As a highly contextualized form of communication, oral transference of information requires familiarity and relationship, which becomes the foundation of understanding one another within the community. For example, oral cultures may have multiple words describing specific characteristics of animals, trees, or other ideas, such as the numerous Eskimo words for snow. Since experience, memory, and close social interactions play such a large part in oral-dominant cultures, the necessity of tying together previous knowledge with current situations becomes more important. These intra-communal interactions, as Goody and Watt argue, are the basis of the individual’s understanding of the world around them, and their memory maintains that which is only culturally relevant, naturally forgetting that which does not lie within the parameters of cultural values and necessities; this act of current self preservation is what Good and Watt call homeostatic organization.

According to Ong, “oral speech is fully natural to human beings,” therefore the introduction of a writing system not only forces humans to think in different ways, but it preserves ideas in time that Goody and Watts’ homeostatic organization would naturally eliminate, given that  the ideas lacked current, cultural relevance. Ong, a supporter of the Great Divide Theory, places emphasis on memory being the key to maintaining oral societies, and since orality doesn’t maintain information in a tangible, concrete manner, ideas can be easily manipulated.
Ong argues that the “term ‘illiterate’ itself suggests that persons belonging to the class it designates are deviants, defined by something they lack” (19). This separation of persons demonstrates more of a systematic division of cognition, supported by those who consider themselves as the more advanced, literate culture. Being literate causes psychological differentiation from those who are not literate.
This autonomous practice of literacy, coined by Street and Bruce, has dominated much of American schooling practices, and completely decontextualizes the social literacy practices that encompass these basic mental skills, and allow them to be understood and relative to a set of given circumstances. This act of decontextualization allows literacy to become easily manipulated and standardized to promote ideas such as social progress, mobility and economic stability. Ong supports that these social implications can exist because of the basic literacy practices that allow a society to record information and history, maintaining “social equilibrium” since there is an inability to simply remove unwanted information that is relevant to the growth and development of a society.
Contrary to the Great Divide theory, based on cognitive differences, there are also several literacy theories that argue that literacy is more of a social practice, and that any differences reflected are results of the various divergences of receiving and giving information.
Scholars such as Deborah Tannen argue against the cognitive divide and stress the idea that there are many factors that differentiate the written and spoken discourses.  In her 1982 essay “Oral and Literate Strategies in Spoken and Written Narratives”, Tannen writes that “non-autonomous language purposely builds on interpersonal involvement and triggers emotional subjective responses, demanding maximum contribution from the audience in supplying socio-cultural and contextual knowledge” (18). Her research supports the idea that the subjectivity of information is important, contrary to the autonomous orientation toward literacy defined as the decoding and encoding of texts as formal mental processes. This subjectivity then connects literacy with a context-based situation, allowing the full process of communication to occur. This is not unlike that which happens in oral-dominant communities.
The dichotomies of literate versus nonliterate, rational versus irrational, and logical versus illogical have caused many scholars to criticize the Great Divide Theory. Other than viewing literacy and cognition as a set of impenetrable, immovable opposing ideas, some argue, or support the idea of literacy represented as a continuum. Other than analytical versus synthetical modes of thinking and communicating, there is a spectrum of representation of each of these ideas.
Literacy has also been defined as a skill utilized to acquire knowledge to engage in activities required for functioning in a group or community.  These skills in reading, writing and math allow the person to build and use these literacy skills for their own personal development and that of the community.  According to Uta Papen in her book Adult Literacy as a Social Practice, the idea of literacy became "increasingly tied to economic considerations" and literacy "became identified with the skills needed in the context of employment and economic development” (9).
Her approach to literacy differs from the idea of a logical and analytical separation of development, but sees the ability to decode texts as a means to participate in daily contexts and access information.  Functional literacy views the practice as a neutral set of technical skills and addresses little with culture and society. The basis for this model lies with a lack of literacy skills and this deficit can be resolved through providing specific education (such as literacy and numeracy) that target these deficits and provide instruction for workplace training and skill building for the greater society.
Another influential approach to literacy is the concept of Critical literacy, an approach associated with Paulo Freire, a Brazilian educator who argued that literacy was not confined to simply decoding texts for information, but a means to become informed and make societal change.  As Papen describes, this approach helped participants "understand the world in terms of justice and injustice, power and oppression" (11) in order to aim towards changing it. The critical literacy approach is different from the functional approach in that it promotes criticism of the power roles and the dominant culture in place of using literacy to change one's socioeconomic circumstances.
Papen offers yet another view of literacy named the liberal model of literacy; the liberal tradition emphasizes individual goals and personal development. Her right to education approach supports a nonrestrictive view of literacy being more than just a functional set of skills to decode text to receive information and even differentiates from the critical literacy approach to support the critique of dominant culture. Liberal views of literacy include the daily practice of reading and writing including that used in leisurely practices and informal writing that may occur outside of formalized events and settings.
Others who argue against the Cognitive Divide theory focus on how exclusive the theory is of other circumstances that may affect cognitive development, and the cultural values and implications when measuring cognition. Some even argue the relatability between those who have received this knowledge through the means of schooling versus those who receive the knowledge through more rhetorical social practices such as singing, oral storytelling, and other forms of oral dominant manners of passing knowledge and information. Closely tied with cognition is memory, and some researchers say that the memory has been the victim of moving from a oral dominant to a literate society. Despite these arguments, there is still much research to be done.
The use of the Cognitive Divide theory is still yet a controversial approach to viewing literacy; although older methods and approaches to literacy were supported by the Divide theory, many of those approaches were contested, and are no longer in effect.  Since main focus is noting the differences in cognitive processes and a society’s ability to analyze, it set a strong foundation for newer literacy practices to develop and countering theories to be explored. Goody and Watt’s studies will continue influencing the way have seen literacy practices shift, and how we argue the advantages and disadvantages of promoting literacy; further studies will continue shaping the world’s view on literacy abilities and how memory, analysis, and critical thinking skills are developed.  



Works Cited
Akinnaso, F. Niyi. “Schooling, Language and Knowledge in Literate and Nonliterate Societies.” Comparative Studies in Society and History January 1992: 68-109. JSTOR. Web. 18 Oct. 2013
Matute, Esmerelda, Teresita Montiel, Noemi Pinto, Monico Rosselli, Alfredo Ardila, Daniel Zarabozo. “Comparing cognitive performance in illiterate and literate children.”  Springer Science+Business Media March 1 2012:110-127. JSTOR. Web. 18 Oct. 2013.
Ong, Walter J. “Writing is a technology that restructures thought.” Literacy: A Critical Sourcebook. Eds. Ellen Cushman, Eugene Kintgen, Barry Kroll and Mike Rose. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martin’s, 2001. Print.
Papen, Uta. Adult Literacy as Social Practice. New York: Routledge, 2005. Print.
Tannen, Deborah. “Oral and Literate Strategies in Spoken and Written Narratives.” Linguistic Society of America March 1992: 1-21. JSTOR. Web. 18 Oct. 2013.
Wiley, Terrence G. Literacy and Language Diversity in the United States. 2nd ed. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics, 2005. Print.


On E.D. Hirsch's "Cultural Literacy"

When reading ED Hirsch's paper, I really had to take a look from his perspective of literacy. Noting the multiple divergences of people that exist makes pinpointing literacy as a cultural practice of passing standardized information from generation to generation very difficult. When looking at how many approaches to literacy and the multiple ways literacy can be received and taught, the simple transmission of information seems fairly basic in its approach. 

There are certain elements of Hirsch's argument, such as needing to know important cultural dates (like Independence Day) and influences that have brought the United States to where we are today, but there are many different conversations that are occurring today that may differ from that of 30 years ago. As Hirsch acknowledged towards the and of the excerpt that we read, each generation has its own important facts that provide a certain meaning to that generation that may not take precedence in the lives of other generations. Does this mean that it isn't important to know what the conflict was (for instance, the Vietnam War)? Of course not! But it does stand to say that I believe that the date that something occured is always as important as knowing the reasons that it occurred, how it affected us as a nation and culture, and how to prevent that same conflict from happening.

I do agree that timing does make a difference. For instance, importance of knowing when the terrorist attacks against the WTC towers occurred leads one to then view that continuum of elements that led up to the attacks and the resulting war that was a focus of most of the last decade. But once again, for the next generation (and the one following that one) the date may fade more from our memory, but the social bonds that unite us to that day will not. 

Many people know the importance of WWII, although they may not know all of the dates (or the super powers). There is a social stress in understanding the conflict. I have personally concluded that Hirsch was not wrong in emphasizing the need to know cultural history, but the elements of critical thinking, analysis, and the ability to synthesize information may need to be stressed more.

Friday, October 18, 2013

Papen- Adult Literacy as Social Practice

"Thinking in terms of literacy as a discourse invites us to look at ahow people are being positioned by dominant discourses and how terms like literacy, illiteracy, funtional literacy and others categorise people and impose social identities."

In this excerpt from her book, Papen discusses the various definitions/types of literacy: functional literacy, critical literacy, and the liberal tradition of literacy.  Each theory has informed programs and political forums that help drive the social discourse, defined as a representation or a description of particular aspects of the physical, social and psychological world. Through cultural influences and sociopolitical powers, literacy has been taken up and viewed as a right or necessity, enforcing more negative views towards other ideas of literacy (or the "lack" of literacy in oral-based communities).

For me, literacy cannot be defined without the context and knowledge of why we have literacy in the first place. The motives and reasoning behind why we practice literacy are normally based in the necessity to communicate, receive  or relay information. Although skills-based approaches to literacy do function in many aspects, it decontextualizes the environments and situations in which literacy takes place. The functional ability to decode text takes place almost entirely in forms of lists, and until the words in that list are provided within context, there usually is no meaning or substance behind the words, except the task of reading them.

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Comments on Alpha Beta

John Man's Alpha Beta covers the idea of the alphabet-- a written form of language through which we communicate thoughts, ideas, and concepts. I found it very interesting to read the way Man approached the alphabet; not as simply a tool to learn in school, but as a growing and developing entity.

 The English alphabet's development alone is one of change after change.
Man's critique of Eric Havelock's view of the Greek alphabet was presented from a point of view that I never had taken myself. The Greek alphabet is the base alphabet of my literacy, but the Greeks merely adapted and developed the alphabet, although their ability to do so is still astonishing in itself. Alpha Beta definitely provides a different view of how to think about the alphabet, and thereon literacy itself.